by Nutcase » Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:09 am
Interesting, pa_guy. Could you post a link? I'm not building an oven, but I'm not building a metal melting furnace either...
Matt, thanks for the clarification. The wire mesh is 6", so that sets the frame of reference, more or less. The system is taller than wide, due to how it was scrunched into the existing 14" wire frame.
I'm sure you're right that this system would have been cleaner if the burn chamber had been shorter. Obviously, in the original 8" square Roxul system, the 2' burn chamber wasn't too long...However, I'm less than certain that it makes sense to have a barrel top routinely running at temps in excess of 700˚F indoors. If 500˚ is a better target, then more heat loss that bypasses the chimney may make sense. However, that's fine tuning in the context of where I'm at now.
As I've indicated from the outset, I've been inspired by your observations about the great consequence of insulation and thermal mass in the burn chamber, and it's predictable that these low mass systems would come up fast and, when adequately insulated, run relatively hot for their size.
Next, I think I will try to make an 8" diameter burn chamber insulated with loose perlite outside the blanket. I probably will put the fuel inlet closer to the barrel, as you suggest.
Mark
(aka Nutcase)